Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 11:42:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 737FB1A81C2E732F818FE1A337A8E805482A4270DEEEAB69D40E416E25C07714
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The note writers can't disprove the fraudolent nature of mail voting that the lawsuit exposes so they resort to calling people conspiracy theorists.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749693847305634261
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 737FB1A81C2E732F818FE1A337A8E805482A4270DEEEAB69D40E416E25C07714
  • createdAtMillis - 1706010176322
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749693847305634261737FB1A81C2E732F818FE1A337A8E805482A4270DEEEAB69D40E416E25C07714