Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 14:13:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DCFF67311BA2F3F42C327B7726AEFC3E183A7F1373A3BDCBD3208D0F7A520B05
Participant Details

Original Note:

If you're going to create a note debunking a conspiracy theory, at least do so in reasonable wording and neutral sourcing. Proposed note is argumentative in nature and is not reasonable to place as context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749642601802924345
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DCFF67311BA2F3F42C327B7726AEFC3E183A7F1373A3BDCBD3208D0F7A520B05
  • createdAtMillis - 1706019199889
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749642601802924345DCFF67311BA2F3F42C327B7726AEFC3E183A7F1373A3BDCBD3208D0F7A520B05