Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 04:15:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3A3A3AAB431A0669708BDC8F2B942513A352D050BAD49CAAB26D33502FBEB7A
Participant Details

Original Note:

If you're going to create a note debunking a conspiracy theory, at least do so in reasonable wording and neutral sourcing. Proposed note is argumentative in nature and is not reasonable to place as context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749642601802924345
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3A3A3AAB431A0669708BDC8F2B942513A352D050BAD49CAAB26D33502FBEB7A
  • createdAtMillis - 1705983341667
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749642601802924345C3A3A3AAB431A0669708BDC8F2B942513A352D050BAD49CAAB26D33502FBEB7A