Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 12:07:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A418FD51502B00FE1A7464695C917283A4BBCAF81F8776A4470DA5E7832299F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

If you're going to create a note debunking a conspiracy theory, at least do so in reasonable wording and neutral sourcing. Proposed note is argumentative in nature and is not reasonable to place as context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749642601802924345
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A418FD51502B00FE1A7464695C917283A4BBCAF81F8776A4470DA5E7832299F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1706011626766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749642601802924345A418FD51502B00FE1A7464695C917283A4BBCAF81F8776A4470DA5E7832299F4