Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 17:36:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65F687F3F0BE41BB456A883BA989742AB6F9566B731F7526D2F0E850C1B7F1DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

If you're going to create a note debunking a conspiracy theory, at least do so in reasonable wording and neutral sourcing. Proposed note is argumentative in nature and is not reasonable to place as context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749642601802924345
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65F687F3F0BE41BB456A883BA989742AB6F9566B731F7526D2F0E850C1B7F1DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1706031393420
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174964260180292434565F687F3F0BE41BB456A883BA989742AB6F9566B731F7526D2F0E850C1B7F1DC