Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 06:23:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 054A46E77687CD48E5B830248EB17DEB76F8A5F9A3C3222B91E7438645B92AF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

If you're going to create a note debunking a conspiracy theory, at least do so in reasonable wording and neutral sourcing. Proposed note is argumentative in nature and is not reasonable to place as context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749642601802924345
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 054A46E77687CD48E5B830248EB17DEB76F8A5F9A3C3222B91E7438645B92AF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1706595799320
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749642601802924345054A46E77687CD48E5B830248EB17DEB76F8A5F9A3C3222B91E7438645B92AF1