Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 02:53:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CE1E83C8E717DE46FC44C334C4CB6A559D62A1749ADB9E1620701FCD400FC4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The framing of the proposed note is too censorial. The OP, at worst, presents a personal opinion/speculation as fact. Any note should simply state as much.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749625058010828944
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CE1E83C8E717DE46FC44C334C4CB6A559D62A1749ADB9E1620701FCD400FC4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1705978413024
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17496250580108289440CE1E83C8E717DE46FC44C334C4CB6A559D62A1749ADB9E1620701FCD400FC4B