Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 02:12:39 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8A4E611AE6C22BF474EB1E60A86B24D58E11430CCE23B6349ACD4FFED73D8655
Participant Details

Original Note:

本文中にも記載ありますが、珠洲に原発はなく仮定に基づいた東京新聞の無意味な推測でしかありません tokyo-np.co.jp/article/304267

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749567971150983414
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8A4E611AE6C22BF474EB1E60A86B24D58E11430CCE23B6349ACD4FFED73D8655
  • createdAtMillis - 1706062359779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17495679711509834148A4E611AE6C22BF474EB1E60A86B24D58E11430CCE23B6349ACD4FFED73D8655