Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-22 23:11:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB252B36ABBB2FFA30F112B8C35ACF005B47D21450E9231BD457715E195A69ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is wrong, and non-lawyers should stop adding legal notes to posts. The Supreme Court vacated a preliminary injunction; it did not rule that Texas acted illegally. If you don't understand that sentence, then don't write a note attempting to make a point of law.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749566144778772959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB252B36ABBB2FFA30F112B8C35ACF005B47D21450E9231BD457715E195A69ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1705965082861
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749566144778772959EB252B36ABBB2FFA30F112B8C35ACF005B47D21450E9231BD457715E195A69ED