Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-22 20:15:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA71B555585F7F629CF715B0F360740578BEEECC39D938391B0103C22CBFDDA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN il link riportato dalla nota rimanda ad una singola rivista che ha ritirato lo studio. Altre riviste non sembrano averlo contestato. Inoltre il ritiro si basa sull'opinione di un capo redattore, non sulla base della valutazione di un paria che entri nel merito dello studio.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749505432295485772
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA71B555585F7F629CF715B0F360740578BEEECC39D938391B0103C22CBFDDA1
  • createdAtMillis - 1705954537760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749505432295485772DA71B555585F7F629CF715B0F360740578BEEECC39D938391B0103C22CBFDDA1