Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-26 19:46:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC3A658C3549485688E3B2661F7C509837409D6255E1B600E6E5397E387A8C4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

I came to CN to see if notes had picked up factual errors in the tweet. Instead I find a pile of notes and NNN arguing as though they are responding to the tweet. I know this is deeply contentious and for many deeply personal but this is not how CN should be used.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749390631091257590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC3A658C3549485688E3B2661F7C509837409D6255E1B600E6E5397E387A8C4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1711482391490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749390631091257590DC3A658C3549485688E3B2661F7C509837409D6255E1B600E6E5397E387A8C4B