Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-14 00:18:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8109F4A99C4D0240F28496FDF160BDFACE0D72E76023FCF6D3457FE0B7DA3E12
Participant Details

Original Note:

I came to CN to see if notes had picked up factual errors in the tweet. Instead I find a pile of notes and NNN arguing as though they are responding to the tweet. I know this is deeply contentious and for many deeply personal but this is not how CN should be used.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749390631091257590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8109F4A99C4D0240F28496FDF160BDFACE0D72E76023FCF6D3457FE0B7DA3E12
  • createdAtMillis - 1707869884892
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17493906310912575908109F4A99C4D0240F28496FDF160BDFACE0D72E76023FCF6D3457FE0B7DA3E12