Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 06:49:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D9DDAF83A7E4AD664B49083B2AF534D7FA26EA42C0FB49067E811CC94F04DAA
Participant Details

Original Note:

None of the suggested CN's suggest a factual error on the contents of the post, hence an added context is not needed. Further it is high time CN author's stop quoting Wikipedia as a credible source. Cause it is not due to its inherent functionality. https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what%E2%80%99s-wrong-wikipedia

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749362908562108473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D9DDAF83A7E4AD664B49083B2AF534D7FA26EA42C0FB49067E811CC94F04DAA
  • createdAtMillis - 1705992596505
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17493629085621084735D9DDAF83A7E4AD664B49083B2AF534D7FA26EA42C0FB49067E811CC94F04DAA