Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-22 19:51:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 54B036C107EF38D7CC979A6D865D5EC542486A20E3D18B1A3D9134D87D58669B
Participant Details

Original Note:

None of the suggested CN's suggest a factual error on the contents of the post, hence an added context is not needed. Further it is high time CN author's stop quoting Wikipedia as a credible source. Cause it is not due to its inherent functionality. https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what%E2%80%99s-wrong-wikipedia

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749362908562108473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 54B036C107EF38D7CC979A6D865D5EC542486A20E3D18B1A3D9134D87D58669B
  • createdAtMillis - 1705953089745
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174936290856210847354B036C107EF38D7CC979A6D865D5EC542486A20E3D18B1A3D9134D87D58669B