Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-22 06:41:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98F53921F20D467EE33CE5646350960023683AAF7A519FFC414E05BAF9013E5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most of the websites that promote Essiac use opinions not backed up by research. Some of this information is often anecdotal evidence. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre tested Essiac in the laboratory. They found it had no anti-cancer features. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/treatment/complementary-alternative-therapies/individual-therapies/essiac https://www.asbestos.com/treatment/alternative/essiac-tea/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749320194886181258
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98F53921F20D467EE33CE5646350960023683AAF7A519FFC414E05BAF9013E5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1705905699167
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174932019488618125898F53921F20D467EE33CE5646350960023683AAF7A519FFC414E05BAF9013E5E