Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-22 04:44:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 188FCC7F0F3E910595BE0C1CA0BBB329434C7FBD9EE2385C93B9F68E98E9192D
Participant Details

Original Note:

While notes are for “potentially misleading” tweets and not exclusively for false claims, to me this tweet doesn’t seem potentially misleading enough to require a note. The new rule disabling monetisation for tweets with a note does also make it more like a form of punishment. https://www.engadget.com/amp/x-wont-pay-creators-for-tweets-that-get-fact-checked-with-community-notes-174206477.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749163321318887734
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 188FCC7F0F3E910595BE0C1CA0BBB329434C7FBD9EE2385C93B9F68E98E9192D
  • createdAtMillis - 1705898673725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749163321318887734188FCC7F0F3E910595BE0C1CA0BBB329434C7FBD9EE2385C93B9F68E98E9192D