Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-22 10:24:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A957D5B8CF7AD3CAB1A53813FB8D40304DC824E0563FD198CA9A65A1DA40DE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article says exactly what the original post says. This note is completely biased and even the article referenced in the quote disputes the claim made in the note. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0f286001-2a28-421a-b761-93f278705f2d?shareToken=ab97b87afda4aee3c120aa7e6412c57d

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749098823622795546
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7A957D5B8CF7AD3CAB1A53813FB8D40304DC824E0563FD198CA9A65A1DA40DE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1705919082640
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17490988236227955467A957D5B8CF7AD3CAB1A53813FB8D40304DC824E0563FD198CA9A65A1DA40DE5