Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-21 16:59:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F7FD6C1A4D084B26D2030BE886F492F80B8C0E279F2DC2E6E2DB723A009DCE3
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that this has happened. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/f25ca840-3266-4cd5-a5a0-4c7366ef6425

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749007425305219339
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F7FD6C1A4D084B26D2030BE886F492F80B8C0E279F2DC2E6E2DB723A009DCE3
  • createdAtMillis - 1705856357262
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17490074253052193396F7FD6C1A4D084B26D2030BE886F492F80B8C0E279F2DC2E6E2DB723A009DCE3