Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-21 12:36:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 636DF84B6242FF287E4C83EFAACF7B4A7FC27A4D34F3B3D87992F440114A8BC7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il commento citato è una semplice critica, mentre il precedente può essere diffamatorio, ma è troppo vago. L'account oggetto di critica causa polemiche facendo engagement farming sui temi calcistici più caldi del momento. https://www.brocardi.it/codice-penale/libro-secondo/titolo-xii/capo-ii/art595.html?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=articolo&utm_content=nav_art_succ_top

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748880625400942762
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 636DF84B6242FF287E4C83EFAACF7B4A7FC27A4D34F3B3D87992F440114A8BC7
  • createdAtMillis - 1705840571908
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1748880625400942762636DF84B6242FF287E4C83EFAACF7B4A7FC27A4D34F3B3D87992F440114A8BC7