Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-22 05:06:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BBE00D7F324ED049BB886FE9F2613CE8D5AC614CE826C854B7434D800F734CA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- the proposed note links to sources that disprove the proposed comment, every clause of which is false. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-27405-w

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748855400332775481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BBE00D7F324ED049BB886FE9F2613CE8D5AC614CE826C854B7434D800F734CA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1705899970844
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1748855400332775481BBE00D7F324ED049BB886FE9F2613CE8D5AC614CE826C854B7434D800F734CA0