Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-21 04:33:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A621B4676F147EC1C4258E3172D4EFD8A1636F872F9A8BF1201D1CD3E29EA59
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Note not needed. 2. YOU made a claim about where they got their data with no proof of how you know that. That’s speculation itself. 3. You posted links referencing living animals. LIVING. Not the ones that WERE, but ARE. And certainly not the ones we eat. Which are dead.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748852215937179770
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A621B4676F147EC1C4258E3172D4EFD8A1636F872F9A8BF1201D1CD3E29EA59
  • createdAtMillis - 1705811621643
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17488522159371797705A621B4676F147EC1C4258E3172D4EFD8A1636F872F9A8BF1201D1CD3E29EA59