Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-21 07:59:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EEA4A2C5C5AA5D79492322BB46FABED39DCDDB01F4E4400CF3BBA05186B2D08A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Honestly, any legit lawyer worth their law license would refuse to represent such stupidity in court, especially considering there IS evidence of Rowling's transphobia. It's not defamation when irrational hatred can be proven. Oh, and has this idiot ever read a history book? https://twitter.com/PopCrave/status/976503947799166976

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1748847639259496751
participantId -
raterParticipantId - EEA4A2C5C5AA5D79492322BB46FABED39DCDDB01F4E4400CF3BBA05186B2D08A
createdAtMillis - 1705823940184
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1748847639259496751EEA4A2C5C5AA5D79492322BB46FABED39DCDDB01F4E4400CF3BBA05186B2D08A