Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-21 05:26:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7C35F67031CAC6C054C85AAB041D48F4D6DEC4B2EAA0B8512D6E80F0413EA38
Participant Details

Original Note:

Honestly, any legit lawyer worth their law license would refuse to represent such stupidity in court, especially considering there IS evidence of Rowling's transphobia. It's not defamation when irrational hatred can be proven. Oh, and has this idiot ever read a history book? https://twitter.com/PopCrave/status/976503947799166976

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1748847639259496751
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E7C35F67031CAC6C054C85AAB041D48F4D6DEC4B2EAA0B8512D6E80F0413EA38
createdAtMillis - 1705814804528
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1748847639259496751E7C35F67031CAC6C054C85AAB041D48F4D6DEC4B2EAA0B8512D6E80F0413EA38