Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-20 23:30:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 08D4DC423E6E7DA4404DF638ACACAE09183D26B89CD4035086F69BDE719C09A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Honestly, any legit lawyer worth their law license would refuse to represent such stupidity in court, especially considering there IS evidence of Rowling's transphobia. It's not defamation when irrational hatred can be proven. Oh, and has this idiot ever read a history book? https://twitter.com/PopCrave/status/976503947799166976

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1748847639259496751
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 08D4DC423E6E7DA4404DF638ACACAE09183D26B89CD4035086F69BDE719C09A4
createdAtMillis - 1705793417740
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 174884763925949675108D4DC423E6E7DA4404DF638ACACAE09183D26B89CD4035086F69BDE719C09A4