Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-20 15:15:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B93D24BDE3C0CD300B71D9F5EADE7D3F70455C0CADA45A8B84A76E0676B9B71F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN; any argument based on Clark's clientele, as opposed to the actual argument made on the basis of Common Article 3, is ad hominem and thus irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748458940264771702
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B93D24BDE3C0CD300B71D9F5EADE7D3F70455C0CADA45A8B84A76E0676B9B71F
  • createdAtMillis - 1705763742370
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1748458940264771702B93D24BDE3C0CD300B71D9F5EADE7D3F70455C0CADA45A8B84A76E0676B9B71F