Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-21 05:26:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6A0BDAFFB3146770685AFE5DA22459CF35C2600B400AC21F888AF3D350617147
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN; any argument based on Clark's clientele, as opposed to the actual argument made on the basis of Common Article 3, is ad hominem and thus irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748458940264771702
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6A0BDAFFB3146770685AFE5DA22459CF35C2600B400AC21F888AF3D350617147
  • createdAtMillis - 1705814799950
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17484589402647717026A0BDAFFB3146770685AFE5DA22459CF35C2600B400AC21F888AF3D350617147