Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-20 06:35:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E3B17D81A58428D711EC3C91FEEB22ABCF675FD04230356C73BCD8BF36E15A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN; any argument based on Clark's clientele, as opposed to the actual argument made on the basis of Common Article 3, is ad hominem and thus irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748458940264771702
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E3B17D81A58428D711EC3C91FEEB22ABCF675FD04230356C73BCD8BF36E15A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1705732506753
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17484589402647717025E3B17D81A58428D711EC3C91FEEB22ABCF675FD04230356C73BCD8BF36E15A9