Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 21:43:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39F13BBE28E6108781D541C2490DD6D14C8F515E3BB2F9431F001E86994C21B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN; any argument based on Clark's clientele, as opposed to the actual argument made on the basis of Common Article 3, is ad hominem and thus irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748458940264771702
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39F13BBE28E6108781D541C2490DD6D14C8F515E3BB2F9431F001E86994C21B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1705700614122
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174845894026477170239F13BBE28E6108781D541C2490DD6D14C8F515E3BB2F9431F001E86994C21B0