Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 21:53:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3421CA71D8483E8A17DFAD975AF1D562BD279488A1773DCBCE3FFD411DAF7F68
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN; any argument based on Clark's clientele, as opposed to the actual argument made on the basis of Common Article 3, is ad hominem and thus irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748458940264771702
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3421CA71D8483E8A17DFAD975AF1D562BD279488A1773DCBCE3FFD411DAF7F68
  • createdAtMillis - 1705701195892
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17484589402647717023421CA71D8483E8A17DFAD975AF1D562BD279488A1773DCBCE3FFD411DAF7F68