Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 21:30:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A70643F43FE4996D310DAA40FDAD8233070BDD56D07F61D4C84E65C4BEB3FF05
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Labour can claim the report is inaccurate all they like, that doesn’t change the story’s legitimacy. Labour would obviously deny it if they weren’t ready to announce yet, as do ALL parties for early leaks. It’s basic media handling.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748410788027449642
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A70643F43FE4996D310DAA40FDAD8233070BDD56D07F61D4C84E65C4BEB3FF05
  • createdAtMillis - 1705699841904
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1748410788027449642A70643F43FE4996D310DAA40FDAD8233070BDD56D07F61D4C84E65C4BEB3FF05