Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 17:09:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0214AA8DFE4A29CB3E81CEF393DDD055284D950451B052B15636BD36A18AAAEF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community Notes is based on open-source research and is reliable - while it’s not perfect, requiring that users who DISAGREE with each other & have diverse perspectives to agree on a Note forces notes to be apolitical and have substantial backing for their factual claims. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1748367805118882158
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0214AA8DFE4A29CB3E81CEF393DDD055284D950451B052B15636BD36A18AAAEF
createdAtMillis - 1705684148986
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 17483678051188821580214AA8DFE4A29CB3E81CEF393DDD055284D950451B052B15636BD36A18AAAEF