Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 11:03:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADCACCD35DC3BAF9E8E807274C5671D51FFD6F2B035488F4DC4A3B6534086F95
Participant Details

Original Note:

"La jurisprudence retient de manière traditionnelle que les avantages matrimoniaux ne sont pas des libéralités et ne sont donc révoqués ni par l’indignité, ni par l’ingratitude" https://www.cridon-ne.org/violences-conjugales-devolution-successorale-nouveau-cas-indignite/ https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000007040217

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748249745976438793
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADCACCD35DC3BAF9E8E807274C5671D51FFD6F2B035488F4DC4A3B6534086F95
  • createdAtMillis - 1705662198512
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1748249745976438793ADCACCD35DC3BAF9E8E807274C5671D51FFD6F2B035488F4DC4A3B6534086F95