Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 21:50:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 630E7EF0A93A1F86A62FC596C053A39CEDD244D7B38383F2603E91088E167D7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed for this post. It is a genuine topic of political discourse as to whether the way judges (judicial branch) and public servants (employees in the executive branch) have interpreted the Treaty of Waitangi, including in how the Waitangi Tribunal approaches claims.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748209009566568632
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 630E7EF0A93A1F86A62FC596C053A39CEDD244D7B38383F2603E91088E167D7D
  • createdAtMillis - 1705701048428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1748209009566568632630E7EF0A93A1F86A62FC596C053A39CEDD244D7B38383F2603E91088E167D7D