Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 05:29:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96AA25868B8F22D32BDF20865887FA632BF3F63D4C4B7633940AC40676384B4E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The attached decision of the College shows the balance that it sought to achieve between Peterson's freedom to express his views on the one hand, and the kind of professional conduct expected from accredited psychologists https://creaseharman.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/peterson-v.-college-of-psychologists-of-ontario-dc-714-22-final-18-augus.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748171459799740694
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96AA25868B8F22D32BDF20865887FA632BF3F63D4C4B7633940AC40676384B4E
  • createdAtMillis - 1705642193360
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 174817145979974069496AA25868B8F22D32BDF20865887FA632BF3F63D4C4B7633940AC40676384B4E