Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 15:28:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 180521627ACEA621CD12BCF4733384C0AF0C5FB8D39628CDD42849410D885492
Participant Details

Original Note:

The attached decision of the College shows the balance that it sought to achieve between Peterson's freedom to express his views on the one hand, and the kind of professional conduct expected from accredited psychologists https://creaseharman.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/peterson-v.-college-of-psychologists-of-ontario-dc-714-22-final-18-augus.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748171459799740694
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 180521627ACEA621CD12BCF4733384C0AF0C5FB8D39628CDD42849410D885492
  • createdAtMillis - 1705678080747
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1748171459799740694180521627ACEA621CD12BCF4733384C0AF0C5FB8D39628CDD42849410D885492