Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 16:25:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9E00F45198673D8021C2DC62315BC29E7EAA5C56BAF13F1A6E4E61D6E504DA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note inutile et politique. Son démenti ne prouve pas que cela est faux, surtout quand des sources prouvent que c’est son propre compte. Pareil pour les rapports et les amendements : note inutile et politique. Le X relate seulement l’enquête. https://x.com/cerfiafr/status/1748114465545949385?s=46&t=Zox6ou7HmXPu_WX8qFYTsA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748165261625106933
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9E00F45198673D8021C2DC62315BC29E7EAA5C56BAF13F1A6E4E61D6E504DA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1705681506861
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1748165261625106933A9E00F45198673D8021C2DC62315BC29E7EAA5C56BAF13F1A6E4E61D6E504DA3