Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 21:09:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00F30832A9AA5F1A12640A8583EE64202CDE3761A692CDB282F50F365AAEDABD
Participant Details

Original Note:

“The exact purpose and provenance of the tunnel remains the subject of some debate, but there is no credible evidence it was used for the nefarious purposes social media users are falsely connecting it to.” https://apnews.com/article/synagogue-tunnel-fact-check-30dea243e1619716f8274ebc7f596f5c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748053616240291861
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00F30832A9AA5F1A12640A8583EE64202CDE3761A692CDB282F50F365AAEDABD
  • createdAtMillis - 1705612188754
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 174805361624029186100F30832A9AA5F1A12640A8583EE64202CDE3761A692CDB282F50F365AAEDABD