Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 17:00:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5B0855134A7AF2EDDCE4C481D573029775409FF81CDFDD4A33411447559B618
Participant Details

Original Note:

Incroyable un article de presse serait indissociable de la ligne éditoriale du journal où il est publié. Nn sérieusement si vous avez de quoi remettre en question les faits rapportés vous le faites sinon vous le gardez pour les réponses, les spéculations ne méritent pas de notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748025063238934754
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5B0855134A7AF2EDDCE4C481D573029775409FF81CDFDD4A33411447559B618
  • createdAtMillis - 1705597212192
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1748025063238934754A5B0855134A7AF2EDDCE4C481D573029775409FF81CDFDD4A33411447559B618