Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 22:49:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71A9DFBACF0FC9E874940A1A233BAE00F77D717278B1292C39D7FEB387737AAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

La note proposée apporte une information incomplète : certains journalistes ont bien du soumettre leur question à approbation (Médiapart, BBC, etc) et d'autres (média installés Afp, lemonde) non. Arrêt sur Images détaille cette différence de traitement ici: https://twitter.com/d_schneidermann/status/1748017074759143890?s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748020253810970744
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71A9DFBACF0FC9E874940A1A233BAE00F77D717278B1292C39D7FEB387737AAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1705618150901
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174802025381097074471A9DFBACF0FC9E874940A1A233BAE00F77D717278B1292C39D7FEB387737AAE