Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 13:26:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 695C7C7DC6C6E99B57AF5375F3B314C35456C55F0704BB39F5AF492248F62C1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The linked blog is based on a paper which has received a critical review from experts in the field: "We urge others to proceed with extreme caution in reading the paper by Alzahrani [1], which suffers from a number of fatal flaws.. [detailed in 5 bullet points]" https://pubpeer.com/publications/CD0E2CD6E82EB2F69173F5A1193331#1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747971938470031779
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 695C7C7DC6C6E99B57AF5375F3B314C35456C55F0704BB39F5AF492248F62C1A
  • createdAtMillis - 1705584393153
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1747971938470031779695C7C7DC6C6E99B57AF5375F3B314C35456C55F0704BB39F5AF492248F62C1A