Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 04:04:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FDE3132E95EB6F48081913CA63F0A2D023D4131B72013DD787E6BC602C56A41D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reuters debunked this in May 2020: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN22W29N/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747865880422125877
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FDE3132E95EB6F48081913CA63F0A2D023D4131B72013DD787E6BC602C56A41D
  • createdAtMillis - 1705637078704
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1747865880422125877FDE3132E95EB6F48081913CA63F0A2D023D4131B72013DD787E6BC602C56A41D