Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 22:26:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E53476E32E2AEAB68B0E7BDD0F2A56A3855D8B4DC32BA67040AD3DD3D3EAEBB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

La note insiste sur l'anonymat des sources comme pour les discréditer alors que le secret des sources est un des piliers du journalisme. Et le démenti de l'intéressé n'est pas une preuve, surtout au vu de la teneur du compte.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747784566247440782
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E53476E32E2AEAB68B0E7BDD0F2A56A3855D8B4DC32BA67040AD3DD3D3EAEBB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1717367196560
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1747784566247440782E53476E32E2AEAB68B0E7BDD0F2A56A3855D8B4DC32BA67040AD3DD3D3EAEBB4