Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 01:46:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A1BA840E8A6E7184068DEA136813708FBA00F9B5A226DA64A8DA65BF1B6060E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN on this post as the OP is clearly an opinion. Additionally, the note proposed states that Carroll had DNA to corroborate her claim but the linked source shows no DNA was admitted into evidence. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-dna-will-not-used-civil-trial-writer-accused-rape-judge-rules-rcna70807

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747771476277616973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A1BA840E8A6E7184068DEA136813708FBA00F9B5A226DA64A8DA65BF1B6060E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1705628791253
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1747771476277616973A1BA840E8A6E7184068DEA136813708FBA00F9B5A226DA64A8DA65BF1B6060E5