Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-19 06:21:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36DED4B563946682F452DDC364BB149CE7ABCC9223ABE84A5B24335F4477F12C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN on this post as the OP is clearly an opinion. Additionally, the note proposed states that Carroll had DNA to corroborate her claim but the linked source shows no DNA was admitted into evidence. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-dna-will-not-used-civil-trial-writer-accused-rape-judge-rules-rcna70807

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747771476277616973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36DED4B563946682F452DDC364BB149CE7ABCC9223ABE84A5B24335F4477F12C
  • createdAtMillis - 1705645268969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174777147627761697336DED4B563946682F452DDC364BB149CE7ABCC9223ABE84A5B24335F4477F12C