Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 01:08:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post does not make any misleading claims. Using data collected from the early 90s to the 2020's is easily considered "recent" in terms of human medical history. There will always be a lag between data collection and analysis, that does not make the analysis invalid.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747744044405731719
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79
  • createdAtMillis - 1705540103971
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17477440444057317191F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79