Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-17 19:32:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1CFF686E280C251A08B3143F567AB055D6215C33A3F94F015F23DA00C33E9AFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Statements are factually correct. I would also kindly invite authors of the notes to read their own source. Here’s another: https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747701728416284961
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1CFF686E280C251A08B3143F567AB055D6215C33A3F94F015F23DA00C33E9AFD
  • createdAtMillis - 1705519920773
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17477017284162849611CFF686E280C251A08B3143F567AB055D6215C33A3F94F015F23DA00C33E9AFD