Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 09:18:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E774D995222C8F7C88CD4B96E394D53888C80B92B348CA0BC39D974BBC30CF44
Participant Details

Original Note:

Peterson has rules to adhere to as part of a professional association. He has refused, and the courts have decided that he has no legal standing to refuse. Nothing about this is a free speech issue, and is related to professional conduct and ethics for clinical psychologists. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=91dbe0d3-3b84-4775-b310-9fabebfe696e

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747679303989404123
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E774D995222C8F7C88CD4B96E394D53888C80B92B348CA0BC39D974BBC30CF44
  • createdAtMillis - 1705569525031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1747679303989404123E774D995222C8F7C88CD4B96E394D53888C80B92B348CA0BC39D974BBC30CF44