Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-17 17:03:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96B33105D11B4D49D048826F11D444612C0C302DCDD8F6E41AE8AEC21455D745
Participant Details

Original Note:

The way X is built, it's not immediately clear that it's satire when being reposted/quoted. Way too many people fell for it, so CN is justified. Also, the account itself is not clearly marked as satire, so anything it posts might be considered serious.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747584243872481351
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96B33105D11B4D49D048826F11D444612C0C302DCDD8F6E41AE8AEC21455D745
  • createdAtMillis - 1705511009748
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174758424387248135196B33105D11B4D49D048826F11D444612C0C302DCDD8F6E41AE8AEC21455D745