Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-17 12:06:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C965F4D1167E40397368EFF09D26383A7DCEB5CF65D95C71695EF991CECD33F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CN didn't provide any evidence to prove otherwise, and instead resorted to argumentative comment of denial. With no evidence to back their claim, it becomes a biased, argumentative comment that belongs in the replies. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747528902099054993
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C965F4D1167E40397368EFF09D26383A7DCEB5CF65D95C71695EF991CECD33F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1705493214065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1747528902099054993C965F4D1167E40397368EFF09D26383A7DCEB5CF65D95C71695EF991CECD33F1