Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-17 20:17:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6411705A5C55B5B105085C0A6DE362BCB800BF7BF59C0A3F855B1D4A8C60B0BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CN didn't provide any evidence to prove otherwise, and instead resorted to argumentative comment of denial. With no evidence to back their claim, it becomes a biased, argumentative comment that belongs in the replies. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747528902099054993
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6411705A5C55B5B105085C0A6DE362BCB800BF7BF59C0A3F855B1D4A8C60B0BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1705522641844
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17475289020990549936411705A5C55B5B105085C0A6DE362BCB800BF7BF59C0A3F855B1D4A8C60B0BE